Comments on: Love of History Proof http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/ A historical perspective of current events Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:54:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38 By: constantinakatsari http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/#comment-290 Wed, 05 May 2010 07:58:29 +0000 http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-290 Neville,
you need to get some proper sleep!

]]> By: Abahachi http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/#comment-289 Wed, 05 May 2010 07:56:15 +0000 http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-289 Surely a true, passionate lover of history feels a gut-wrenching rage at seeing her coquette herself with the grotesque simplifications of television programmes and trite journalistic analogies? So, I don’t do 2, 3, 4, 5 or 7 (or 8, but that’s a different issue), I don’t think biography is proper history and I don’t think 9 applies in all circumstances (particle physics, for example), and I still consider myself a lover of history. Dear me, I’m in a bad mood this morning; something to do with being woken by the cats at 4.30…

]]> By: constantinakatsari http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/#comment-288 Mon, 03 May 2010 16:14:28 +0000 http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-288 Why don’t you add you own criteria here?

]]> By: Manolis http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/#comment-287 Mon, 03 May 2010 13:29:01 +0000 http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-287 Well, I do numbers 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9. (At least to some extent.)

As for number 10, I propose: “Studies history when s/he should be ironing clothes”.

So I do number 10 too…

]]> By: Roger Pearse http://loveofhistory.com/love-of-history-proof/#comment-286 Mon, 03 May 2010 12:11:15 +0000 http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-286 Evidently I don’t love history, if those are the criteria; which suggests they may need some revision.

]]>