<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Love of History &#187; classical receptions journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loveofhistory.com/tag/classical-receptions-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loveofhistory.com</link>
	<description>A historical perspective of current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 15:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Classical Receptions Journal</title>
		<link>http://loveofhistory.com/classical-receptions-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://loveofhistory.com/classical-receptions-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[constantinakatsari]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classical receptions journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantinakatsari.wordpress.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I am in the mood of reception studies&#8230; it may be worth taking a look at the new Oxford University Press Journal called Classical Reception Journal. It has just been published online and can be viewed by clicking on the link: http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/3929/1. The issue includes a free editorial from Lorna Hardwick. The following paper is freely available: &#8220;Hyperion’s symposium: an erotics of reception&#8221;. In addition, for a set fee of 25 American dollars, you can read research articles by Richard Hingley, Gesine Manuwald, Sebastian Matzner, Konstantinos Nikoloutsos, Betine van Zyl Smit, and Joanna Paul. Personally, I think that the fee is excessive and that it should be reduced to half. This way, they will get a lot more people to download the articles, while the authors will profit from the additional references to their work. Who am I, though, to suggest such a radical proposition ot OUP? Until then, I will content myself with the reading of the FREE abstracts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://loveofhistory.com/classical-receptions-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
